photo top ED HIV Test Guide . org corner
HIV Testing in Emergency Departments: A Practical Guide
spacer

Assess Your Readiness: Patient Selection

What patient population do you aim to reach with HIV testing in the ED?

  • All patients in the ED?
  • All patients in a particular area, such as urgent care or fast track?
  • All patients with unknown HIV status?
  • Anyone who wants a test?
  • Patients presenting with sexually transmitted infections (STI)?
  • Patients who present with symptoms, risk behaviors, or medical histories that may indicate HIV infection/AIDS?
  • Other?

The goal of the effort, along with the characteristics of the patient population, HIV (and other STI) prevalence, and the human and financial resources available for HIV testing, will inform which testing approach is the most practical for your ED.  For more information on testing approaches, click here.  For guidance on how to set up your program so you can measure your progress and success, go here.

Testing Approaches

May require additional staffing

Pilot recommended

Requires linking to care

Better for limited resources

Communities with <1% prevalence

Communities with >1% prevalence

Diagnostic testing   check check check check

 

Targeted testing check check check check check

check

Screening or universal testing check check check    

check

To ensure a smoother start and consistent running of the program over time, consider the range of financial, legal, operational, and staffing issues and address those issues early. Leave room to be flexible and adapt to unexpected issues. Program characteristics that may facilitate implementation include:

  • Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for specific staff members.
  • Staff dedicated to HIV testing.
  • Oversight by ED-based project manager.
  • Consistent funding source.
  • Easy access to a pool of dedicated staff (e.g., medical/nursing students, HIV counselors).
  • Testing functions coordinated with typical staff duties (e.g., nurses draw specimens, lab runs all tests, physicians deliver test results).
  • HIV testing made part of standard operations (e.g., all patients are offered an HIV test at triage and this is recorded in the medical record and executed by medical staff).
  • ED providers oriented to the testing program and given guidelines and protocols on when testing is to be offered.

Characteristics that can impede implementation include:

  • Limited space in the ED to accommodate additional staff.
  • Limited staff capacity in laboratory to run tests.
  • Turnover of supplemental staff dedicated to HIV testing.
  • Real and perceived burden on providers to obtain informed consent.
  • Real and perceived requirement to obtain informed consent.
  • Providers' belief that HIV testing is an ancillary activity, secondary to treatment of chief complaints.
  • Reliance on presence of counselor.
  • Lack of method to follow up with patients who initially decline.
  • Reliance on individual providers.
  • Busy periods in ED and quick turnover of fast-track patients.
  • Ongoing need for staff training.





<< Prev Page  |  Next Page >>

 

Keep Posted!
Sign up if you would like us to keep you informed regarding updates to the HIV Guide and this web site. We will not share your information with anyone.

HRET (in partnership with AHA)
corner

This guide was made possible through a cooperative agreement between the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research (APTR), award number TS-0990;
its contents are the responsibility of HRET and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the CDC or APTR.

This website contains links to sites that are not owned or maintained by the Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET) or the American
Hospital Association (AHA). HRET and AHA are not responsible for the content of linked sites and the views expressed on non-HRET/AHA
linked sites do not necessarily reflect the views of the Health Research and Educational Trust or the American Hospital Association.